|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
11th Circuit Court of Appeals - April 14, 2006
|
| |
Archer v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 05-16045 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 14, 2006, Decided , April 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The only issue on appeal was whether plaintiff's Social Security disability case should have been remanded pursuant to 42 U.S.C.S. § 405(g) for consideration of new evidence; after a thorough review of the record, the reviewing court concluded that the new evidence was not material, as it was unlikely to have changed the outcome.
|
|
| |
Bashir v. Rockdale County, No. 05-12020,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 14, 2006, Decided , April 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Entry of summary judgment in favor of sheriff's deputies was reversed because the deputies violated plaintiff's Fourth Amendment rights when they unlawfully entered his house and arrested him, their warrantless entry was not justified, the right was clearly established at the time, and thus, they were not entitled to qualified immunity.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Wholesale Telecom Corp. v. ITC Deltacom Communs., Inc., No. 05-13404 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 14, 2006, Decided , April 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a contract case, the district court's grant of a telecommunications provider's cross-motion for summary judgment was affirmed because a service agreement was not ambiguous, and the agreement did not limit the term tariff to tariffs filed with a regulatory body.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|