 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Clarke v. HHS, No. 05-15698 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2006, Decided , April 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An appeal was dismissed as it related to the district court's dismissal of the claimant's reimbursement claim because the appeal was untimely. The district court's denial of the claimant's motion to reopen was affirmed because the claimant had not asserted any new arguments that would have changed the outcome.
|
|||||
| James v. Barnhart, No. 05-16238 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2006, Decided , April 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's affirmation of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of disability income benefits and supplemental security income was also affirmed because the claimant's due process rights were not violated and substantial evidence supported the ALJ's finding that the claimant could do sedentary work.
|
|||||
| Termnet Merch. Servs. v. Marson, No. 04-16144,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2006, Decided , April 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a declaratory judgment case, a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of a merchant was affirmed because a company's procedural due process rights were not violated when a West Virginia state court entered a default judgment against it without notice. Additionally, the company's substantive due process rights were not violated.
|
|||||
| United States v. Angulo Hernandez, No. 05-12613 Non-Argument Calendar, No. 05-13185 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's finding that defendants were not minor participants was affirmed because they were held responsible only for the amount of cocaine they personally smuggled. Their concurrent 135-month sentences for 46 U.S.C.S. app. § 1903(a), (g), and (j), 21 U.S.C.S. § 960(b)(1)(B)(ii), and 18 U.S.C.S. § 2 were affirmed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Giraldo, No. 05-15588 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 57-month sentence for violating 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 952(a) and 960(b)(2) was affirmed because defendant failed to show that the sentence was unreasonable. The sentence was at the lowest end of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
