 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Puerto Rican Ass'n of Physical Med. & Rehab., Inc. v. United States, No. 07-2476,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 26, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where doctors and patients challenged an administrative regulation that limited Medicare reimbursement for physical therapy services, their suit was properly dismissed because they had not exhausted administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C.S. §§ 1395ff(b)(a)(A), 405(h); review was not being precluded-merely postponed-until a claim was denied.
|
|||||
| Qun Lin v. Mukasey, No. 07-1658,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 26, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A native and citizen of the People's Republic of China who claimed that he was persecuted because he practiced Falun Gong was properly denied asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief as an adverse credibility finding, as governed by the Real ID Act of 2005, 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158(b), was proper given internal contradictions in his testimony.
|
|||||
| United States v. Colon-Diaz, No. 06-2550,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 26, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's drug-related convictions were affirmed because his individual complaints as to evidentiary rulings under Fed. R. Evid. 403 and Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E) and Jencks Act error were rejected and the court did not find substantial prejudice. Therefore, his convictions were not tainted by cumulative error.
|
|||||
| United States v. Lachman, Nos. 06-1058, 06-1060, 06-1061,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 26, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court denied the president's motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 based on evidence that they discovered post-trial because the foundation for a good-faith defense based on an exclusive use reading was simply absent and the president could not now credibly proffer testimony tailored to fit newly developed evidence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Piesak, No. 07-2164,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 26, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendant's conviction for attempting to manufacture ecstasy pursuant to 21 U.S.C.S. § 846 because she, at one point, possessed all of the necessary chemicals, conducted significant research regarding the process, tested and assembled laboratory equipment, and admitted to intending to make the drug inside her house.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
