 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bergeron v. Cabral, No. 08-1683,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 9, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sheriff was properly denied qualified immunity in First Amendment retaliation case as no reasonable official could have thought that she could divest deputy sheriffs opposed to her political aspirations of their commissions-and thus of opportunity to work lucrative security details-while leaving political supporters to cash in on the opportunities.
|
|||||
| Green v. Concord Baptist Church, No. 08-1977,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 9, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A reviewing court did not need to decide whether a district court acted precipitously in dismissing plaintiff's complaint without leave to amend because any such error would have been harmless, since it was clear that an opportunity to amend was futile when the chances of stating a cognizable claim were virtually nonexistent.
|
|||||
| Mir-Yepez v. Banco Popular, No. 08-1868,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 9, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Comfort v. Lynn Sch. Comm., No. 08-1735,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 12, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs were rightly denied Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(5) relief from judgment as, while later decision calling their decision inimical to Constitution was on point, it was not connected to their case; and, that party might be precluded from relitigating a matter due to claim preclusion was insufficient to imbue prior judgment with prospective force.
|
|||||
| United States v. Arbour, No. 07-1979,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 12, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's drug and firearms sentence under 18 U.S.C.S. § 922 and 21 U.S.C.S. § 841 was properly enhanced under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1(a) as he was involved in extensive drug activity, trafficking drugs for 18 months and supplying individuals with cocaine; also, he led or organized one or more of the five or more participants.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rivera-Maldonado, No. 07-1426,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 12, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant could withdraw plea to child pornography possession under 18 U.S.C.S. § 2252(a)(4)(B) as there was plain error that affected his substantial rights and the fairness of the proceedings; in his Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 plea colloquy, he was told that supervised release period was three years when it was actually life under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3538(k).
|
|||||
| Emhart Indus. v. Century Indem. Co., Nos. 07-2806, 07-2821,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 13, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In CERCLA action, insurer was properly assessed total costs of successor's defense, but only to date of jury's finding that it owed no duty to indemnify, because district court properly applied "pleadings test" to both primary and excess policies to determine duty to defend, and successor had not proven any contract damages beyond costs of defense.
|
|||||
| Northeastern Land Servs. v. NLRB, No. 08-1878,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 13, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: NLRB's order was entitled to deference, and its finding that employer's confidentiality provision was overbroad and violated 29 U.S.C.S. § 158(a)(1) was supported by substantial evidence as, while it did not explicitly restrict 29 U.S.C.S. § 157 activities, it could be fairly read to extend disclosure of employment terms to union representatives.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rodrigue, No. 08-1359,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, March 13, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of crimes per 21 U.S.C.S. § 841, 18 U.S.C.S. § 2, and 18 U.S.C.S. § 924, his Fourth Amendment rights were intact as probable cause supported affidavit submitted supporting search warrant application; based on totality of circumstances, it was reasonable to conclude that campsite was connected to marijuana cultivation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
