|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
Federal Courts -
1st Circuit Court of Appeals - April 30 - May 7, 2008
|
| |
|
| |
Lupu v. Wyndham El Conquistador Resort, No. 07-1659,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, April 30, 2008, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Undisputed facts, as the district court held, demonstrated that the employee never participated in an activity protected by P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 29, ? 194a, which prohibited retaliation against certain defined whistle-blowers. Also, dismissal of his claim for negligence under P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 31, ? 5141 was upheld.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Herrera-Martinez, No. 07-1363,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, April 30, 2008, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant, an undocumented immigrant, was rightly convicted per 42 U.S.C.S. ? 408(a)(7)(B) and 18 U.S.C.S. ?? 1028A, 641 for using another's information, including an SSN, to secure section 8, 42 U.S.C.S. ? 1437 et seq., housing as proof of asportation was not required and proscribed payments were not limited to those under the Social Security Act.
|
|
| |
Barroso-Herrans v. Lugo-Mender (In re Barroso-Herrans), No. 07-1757,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, May 7, 2008, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where debtors claimed $ 4,000 exemptions under 11 U.S.C.S. ? 522(d) for two lawsuits and their trustee did not object, when they later claimed that the full value of the suits was exempted, a settlement of the suits was properly upheld as their explanation-that $ 4,000 was an expected value-was dubious, and such was an implausible full valuation.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|