LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 1st Circuit Court of Appeals - May 31 - June 4, 2007

  
Metallic v. Comm'r, No. 06-2387, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, May 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Nesimi v. Gonzales, No. 06-2168, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, May 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because substantial evidence supported the BIA's conclusion that, even if the alien suffered from past politically-motivated persecution, any fear of future persecution was not well-founded based on the changed conditions in Albania, the court affirmed the BIA's denial of the alien's asylum application under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rossi v. Gemma, No. 06-2020, No. 06-2021, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, May 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Younger abstention applied to claims brought under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 by property owners challenging an ongoing mechanics' lien action in state court because the federal claims would substantially interfere with the state enforcement proceedings involving an important state interest and the constitutional challenges could be made in state court.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rupprecht v. City of Pittsfield, No. 06-2767, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, May 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Pacheco, No. 06-1520, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, May 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was properly sentenced to 36 months' imprisonment for conspiracy to distribute controlled substances because the chronology of events supported that the ketamine that he mailed to a boy was the same that the boy took, causing him serious physical injury, supporting an upward departure pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.2.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Rivera-Rodriguez, No. 04-1009, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, May 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed because: the sentencing judge relied on record evidence of which defendant was aware and had an opportunity to rebut; there was no breach of the plea agreement based on the government's comments suggesting a higher sentence; and imposition of a two-level enhancement was supported by the record.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, No. 05-2572, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, June 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion when it found that the evidence could not justify a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 because the monthly abandoned vehicle reports were in the files that were available to defendant at the time of trial and in the exercise of ordinary diligence, he would, and should, have discovered them.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.