LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 1st Circuit Court of Appeals - June 13 - June 14, 2006

  
Boyd v. Comm'r, No. 05-2517, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The dismissal of taxpayers' claim that the IRS improperly failed to utilize the statutory levy process under 26 U.S.C.S. § 6330 when it offset their joint income tax refund against a prior business-related tax debt was affirmed because the Tax Court's jurisdiction was limited to cases where taxpayers obtained a written notice of determination.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kilgore v. Comm'r, No. 05-1793, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kilty v. Worth Dev. Corp., No. 05-2101, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 506:1 barred a breach of contract claim that tenants filed against landlords because a five-year commercial lease was not signed; furthermore, because summary judgment was entered against the tenants on claims of fraud and misrepresentation, the tenants could not rely on those allegations to circumvent the statute of frauds.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Brown, No. 05-2170, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction for distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1) was affirmed because the admission of testimony by a drug enforcement agent concerning the identity of defendant's voice in recorded conversations where the agent lacked personal knowledge under Fed. R. Evid. 602 was harmless.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Sayer, No. 05-1917, No. 05-1918, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a property owner purchased a farm in foreclosure from a town for the amount of the taxes due, prior mortgages on the farm held by the federal government were extinguished pursuant to Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 36, § 943, because the government failed to pay the taxes within three months of actual knowledge of the lien.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Esso Std. Oil Co. v. Rodriguez-Perez, No. 05-1722, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, June 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Magistrate properly exercised supplemental jurisdiction over defendants' state law counterclaims because although plaintiff's CERCLA claim was not properly before magistrate, it asserted actionable claim under 42 U.S.C.S. § 6972. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) did not apply; counterclaims were dismissed before plaintiff filed voluntary dismissal motion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Pagan-Santini, No. 03-2574, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, June 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: District court did not commit plain error when it give a unanimity instruction under Fed. R. Crim. P. 30 where the evidence was adequate as to the perjurious character of all three statements, and defendant could not show that omitting the instruction probably changed the result nor was there anything close to a miscarriage of justice.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.