 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hatfield-Bermudez v. Aldanondo-Rivera, Nos. 05-2235, 05-2293,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, August 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a jury found in favor of a former night school director after education officials did not renew her contract, concluding that her First Amendment political affiliation rights had been violated, a Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) motion was properly granted as she failed to show that selection committee members were aware of her political affiliation.
|
|||||
| Shank/Balfour Beatty v. IBEW Local 99, No. 06-2480,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, August 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a union laid claim to electrical work while a company asserted that it could assign it as it wished, the dispute was not "jurisdictional" such that it was explicitly excluded under the terms of the parties' collective bargaining agreement because it was not one between competing employees, but rather, it was between the union and management.
|
|||||
| Todisco v. Verizon Communs., Inc., No. 06-1957,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, August 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an ERISA suit, a wife's motion to amend was properly denied as she did not seek appropriate equitable relief that could be awarded per ERISA's § 502(a)(3), 29 U.S.C.S. § 1132(a)(3); she was seeking legal relief under the terms of the plan in that she sought damages due to an employer's failure to honor an oral representation made to her husband.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
