|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
1st Circuit Court of Appeals - July 14 - July 21, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Rodriguez-Ortiz, No. 05-1350, No. 05-1351,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, July 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendants' drug conspiracy convictions under 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, 952(a), and 963 because there was evidence that, inter alia, one defendant procured cellular telephones for use in the conspiracy and the other defendant provided counter-surveillance and protection for the ringleader at a meeting.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Morales-Rodriguez, No. 04-2495,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, July 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's convictions for, inter alia, mail fraud, 18 U.S.C.S. § 1341, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, 18 U.S.C.S. § 371, and embezzlement of labor union funds, 29 U.S.C.S. § 501(c) were affirmed as they were supported by substantial evidence. Defendant's Brady claims and sentencing challenges also failed.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|