 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Guillaume v. Gonzales, No. 06-1547,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, September 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hannon v. Maloney, No. 07-1212,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, September 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Zeno, Nos. 07-8017, 07-2065,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, September 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney failed to establish that his removal from the panel would have been inappropriate under the standards governing reciprocal discipline. Beyond that, and despite his lack of remorse, the appellate court chose not to suspend the attorney from the practice of law before the court since he had nine cases pending before the court.
|
|||||
| Sunoto v. Gonzales, No. 06-1366,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, September 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Espinola, No. 06-2340,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, September 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence adjustment for using a firearm in connection with a drug offense under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1 was affirmed because the district court's inference, that the gun that defendant undisputedly possessed for security during drug transactions was real rather than a toy or a replica, was reasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Guzman, No. 06-2363,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, September 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vazquez-Filippetti v. Banco Popular De P.R., Nos. 05-2372, 06-1432,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, September 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dixon v. Int'l Bhd. of Police Officers, Nos. 06-1210, 06-1211, 06-1212, 06-1851, 06-1852, 06-2094,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, September 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) motions were properly denied because both 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e-3(a) and Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B, § 4(4A), covered a female officer's retaliation claims against unions which caused harm in or outside of workplace. Evidence supported Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B, § 4(4), claim against an officer who filed TRO against female officer.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
