 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jowers v. Lakeside Family & Children's Servs., No. 06-3234-cv,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, May 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mirza v. Gonzales, No. 05-2800-ag,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, May 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Rodin, No. 04-4896-cr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, May 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gonzalez v. Airborne Express, Inc., No. 06-0991-cv,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, June 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ai Lian Huang v. Gonzales, 06-0273-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A Chinese alien was not entitled to a petition for review of the denial of her motion to reopen removal proceedings because the alien's motion was untimely under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii), and she failed to offer any explanation as to why her motion was filed three years outside the deadline or argue that the deadline should be equitably tolled.
|
|||||
| Bi Zhen Lin v. Gonzales, 05-5973-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chinese alien was denied a petition for review of the denial of her motion to reopen because her motion was not timely filed under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and she only submitted evidence of changed personal circumstances, rather than evidence of changed country conditions, which was insufficient to qualify for an exception to the filing deadline.
|
|||||
| Mao Gen Lin v. United States DOJ, 06-3355-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: BIA properly denied Chinese alien's second motion to reopen because alien failed to demonstrate changed country conditions arising in country of nationality under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii), 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii) as he only made generalized statements about how Chinese government was still persecuting Falun Gong practitioners.
|
|||||
| Zhi Qun Chen v. Gonzales, 05-5979-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B) supported an adverse credibility determination in the denial of asylum for a Chinese alien because the alien's testimony before the IJ as to the date of his alleged capture by security guards and the search of his residence by a village committee was inconsistent with his asylum application.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
