LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals - August 28, 2007

  
Agudelo v. Gonzales, 06-0510-ag, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: IJ's finding that an alien was not persecuted was supported by substantial evidence under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B) because the alien stayed in Columbia for two years without consequence after refusing to pay money to a paramilitary group and no evidence indicated that the alien's refusal to cooperate was perceived as having a political dimension.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Chuan Fu Lin v. Bd. of Immigration Appeals, No. 06-4916-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Action denying alien's motion to remand and affirming IJ's denial of alien's motion to reopen his exclusion proceedings was remanded to BIA for it to consider if alien met his burden to show changed country conditions, under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158(a)(2)(D), as BIA's decision was based only on the fact that alien had not proven that he had two children.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Feng Lin v. Gonzales, 06-3220-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hui Yun Ou v. Gonzales, 07-1515-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B) supported an adverse credibility finding to deny asylum and other relief for a Chinese alien because there were significant discrepancies between her testimony and credible fear interview as to the number of times officials beat her and the extent of the injuries she sustained from the beatings.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jiang Hua Jiang v. Gonzales, 06-5345-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B) supported an adverse credibility finding underlying the denial of withholding of removal and CAT relief for a Chinese alien because the alien's testimony was vague, inconsistent, and implausible, particularly with respect to whether he was terminated before or after his wife's abortion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Marsh v. Rosenbloom, 05-0514-cv (Lead), -0702-cv (XAP), -0706-cv (XAP), -0708-cv (XAP), UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Qiao Yi You v. Gonzales, 07-0799-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An IJ's adverse credibility finding was supported by substantial evidence under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B) because it was implausible that an alien was not aware of her betrothal to the son of her father's creditor and the alien's testimony omitted incidents that prompted the alien's father to agree to the timing of the alleged arranged marriage.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Singh v. Gonzales, 06-5382-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Indian alien was denied a petition for review of the denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings because he filed the motion more than four years after the 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) filing deadline, and he failed to show that he was entitled to equitable tolling from ineffective assistance since he did not show that he acted with due diligence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Xiang Yin Chen v. Gonzales, 06-2954-ag, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: IJ's conclusion that alien was not eligible for CAT relief was supported by substantial evidence because alien's testimony that a friend who had left China illegally had been detained upon his return and country reports indicating that some Chinese prisoners were tortured did not compel conclusion that alien would be tortured upon return to China.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Yuan Lin Zhu v. Gonzales, 07-1417-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, August 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B) supported an adverse credibility finding to deny asylum and other relief for a Chinese alien since his airport interview statements that he came to the U.S. to get a job, that he had never been arrested, and that family planning officials destroyed his home were inconsistent with his testimony.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.