 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ballow Brasted O'Brien & Rusin P.C. v. Logan, Docket No. 04-4925-cv,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was affirmed in favor of law firm seeking recovery under fee splitting agreement where defendant attorney's claims for rescission of the agreement based on the law firm's alleged fraudulent misrepresentations were not asserted in a timely manner (nearly 4 years after the agreement) and the equities did not favor recission.
|
|||||
| Shah v. Meeker, Docket No. 04-5965-cv,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of plaintiff's securities-fraud class action as untimely pursuant to 15 U.S.C.S. § 78i(e) was affirmed; a magazine article specifically describing the business practices that served as basis of plaintiff's suit was regarded as storm warning of the fraud alleged. Thus, plaintiff was on inquiry notice more than two years before filing suit.
|
|||||
| Singh v. BIA, Docket No. 04-0996-ag,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for review was denied. Court lacked jurisdiction to review IJ's determination that alien's petition for asylum was untimely. IJ's denial of alien's withholding application on the grounds that the alien failed to demonstrate a likelihood of future persecution was supported by substantial evidence--State Department and U.S. embassy reports.
|
|||||
| Ting Jie Li v. Bd. of Immigration Appeals, No. 03-40222-ag,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for review of the denial of asylum was denied because an alien failed to demonstrate that he suffered harm in China based on his membership in a social group where he offered no evidence of common characteristics of the group other than the broadly-based characteristic of being owners of property and having been the victims of extortion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
