 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Chamberlin v. Principi, No. 06-1291-cv,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An employer was properly granted summary judgment in an employee's lawsuit alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII because the employee failed to present any direct or indirect evidence establishing a causal connection between his protected activities of filing two EEOC complaints and allegedly adverse employment actions.
|
|||||
| United States v. Kaid, Nos. 05-4470-cr (L), 05-4481-cr (CON), 05-4685-cr (CON), 05-6993-cr (CON), 06-0229-cr (CON), 06-0537-cr (CON),
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although New York did not enforce taxes on small quantities of cigarettes purchased on reservations for personal use by non-Native Americans, defendants were properly convicted of trafficking in contraband cigarettes because taxes were enforced when massive quantities of cigarettes were purchased on reservations by non-Native Americans for resale.
|
|||||
| United States v. Kaid, Docket Nos. 05-4470-cr (L), 05-4481-cr (CON), 05-4685-cr (CON), 05-6993-cr (CON), 06-0229-cr (CON), 06-0537-cr (CON),
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although his attorney purportedly was absent for 20 minutes during trial, defendant failed to establish that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel, in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights, because he was unable to show any prejudice from this absence as his counsel thereafter fully challenged the admissibility of certain testimony.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
