LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals - January 26, 2006

  
Alla v. Gonzales, No. 04-4249-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where State Department report indicated that changes favorable to Albanians had occurred in Macedonia, and 2001 report alien relied upon did not address whether changes had occurred since report was written, substantial evidence supported finding that changed country conditions rebutted alien's fear of future persecution based on past persecution.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Camilli v. Grimes, Docket No. 05-1914-cv, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Although a dismissal without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) resulted in some legal prejudice to an attorney due to the fact that he was unable to satisfy the elements of a future malicious prosecution claim, the decision was not an abuse of discretion because this was not the type of prejudice anticipated in case law.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Chang Ming Zou v. United States AG, No. 03-40967-ag, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Alien, a native and citizen of China, was properly denied asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief applications. An IJ's rejection of the alien's testimony that he was detained to compel his girlfriend to have an abortion was supported by substantial evidence under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252 based on government reports and the absence of an abortion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Demarcuks v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., No. 03-41057, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Decision denying an alien's application for asylum was vacated and remanded where an IJ's adverse credibility finding could not have stood because the IJ failed to articulate specific, cogent reasons that bore a legitimate nexus to the finding, and the IJ improperly put the burden of proof on the alien to show that he could not have relocated.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hai He v. Gonzales, No. 04-4315-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Petition for review was denied as the IJ's adverse credibility finding was substantially supported by record. IJ sufficiently supported his finding that alien was merely attempting to relay information that he has memorized and there was no indication that IJ acted arbitrarily or capriciously in his analysis of alien's demeanor during testimony.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jin Jian Zheng v. Gonzales, No. 05-0143-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Petition for review was denied; even if case were remanded because BIA made improper finding as to timeliness of alien's motion to reopen, the outcome would not be different. Supporting documents did not support alien's claim that Chinese government changed enforcement of coercive family planning policy as to its citizens with U.S. born children.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kacaj v. Gonzales, No. 04-1136-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kollacku v. Gonzales, No. 04-1402-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Alien's fear that he would be arrested did not support claims for asylum, withholding of removal, or relief under the CAT where the outstanding arrest warrant in Albania was based on the alien's criminal activities; the arrest would not be persecution based on a protected ground and would be a "legal sanction" that did not contravene the CAT.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Martini v. INS, No. 05-2440-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Court of appeals found that record supported IJ's determination that incidents alien described in support of his claim that he would be persecuted if were returned to Kosovo did not show he had been persecuted, and because he failed to demonstrate past persecution, he was not entitled to a presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Muqkurtaj v. Gonzales, No. 04-4199-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.