 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kaur v. Bd. of Immigration Appeals, 04-5023-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's evidence did not establish changed country conditions under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). It did not demonstrate that India's treatment of Sikhs had changed in any significant way since her first hearing; although petitioner's evidence reflected some change, it was not sufficient to render the BIA's decision an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| Quint v. CMHC, 06-2889-pr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of preliminary injunctive relief to pro se appellant was affirmed; the evidence in the record did not support a claim that the proposed treatment options were medically necessary or would help alleviate appellant's medical condition, which the medical records revealed was degenerative, rather than acute.
|
|||||
| United States v. Harrington, No. 05-6958-cr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Slaughter, 06-2334-cr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly admitted into evidence two prior episodes in which defendant possessed semiautomatic handgun and matching ammunition. Under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b), evidence was properly admitted under opportunity exception of Rule 404(b), as evidence showing that defendant possessed handgun prior to charged crime showed access to such weapon.
|
|||||
| United States v. Tyler, No. 05-5155-cr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Zayas, No. 05-6194-cr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although language making it clear that defendant's immigration status played no role in his sentencing would have been preferable, there was ample evidence that district court did not rest its decision to deny defendant minor role adjustment on such status; thus, defendant's knowing and voluntary waiver of right to appeal sentence was enforceable.
|
|||||
| Xia Fen Huang v. United States DOJ, No. 06-5420-ag,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Zapata v. City of New York, Docket No. 06-1059-cv,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
