 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Xiao v. Bd. of Immigration Appeals, No. 03-40148,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although an immigration judge was permitted to rely on a state department report regarding the use of forced sterilizations in China, it was error to fail to consider contrary evidence offered by an immigrant when determining whether or not her fear of such was objectively well-founded.
|
|||||
| Xiu Zhao v. United State DOJ, No. 03-40352-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where alien's assertions did not constitute changes in law or errors of fact or law in BIA's decision to deny her motion to reopen, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b), but rather merely reiterated her previous arguments and indicated possible changed personal circumstances, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion to reconsider.
|
|||||
| Yei Fu Xu v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Servs., No. 03-41215-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence supported IJ's adverse credibility finding, under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B), where IJ noted several problems with alien's testimony, including material inconsistencies, which alien failed to adequately explain, and these inconsistencies went to heart of alien's claim because they were critical to his account of his wife's sterilization.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
