 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Maqsood v. Bell Sec., Inc., 06-3926-cv,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mingfeng Huang v. Keisler, 05-2963-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Orafan v. Rashid, No. 06-2951-pr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Parra, Nos. 05-2379-cr, 05-3015-cr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Santiago, No. 07-0782-cr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, September 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Faconti v. Potter, No. 06-5271-c v,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, October 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Forbes, No. 07-0348-cr(L), No. 07-2313-cr(con),
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, October 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction was affirmed as, inter alia, court correctly ruled that references to the decline in company's stock price or investor losses were probative on issue of materiality and permissible under Fed. R. Evid. 403, and refusal to compel grant of immunity and to issue missing witness instruction did not constitute abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| United States v. Riley, No. 05-5777-cr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, October 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for mail fraud, under 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 1341, 2, was affirmed as, in sentencing defendant, district court made no procedural error and the sentence was not unreasonably long. While defendant completed his sentence of imprisonment and was serving his term of supervised release, his challenge to length of the sentence was not moot.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
