 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Qinsong Zhang v. United States DOJ, No. 04-2574-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for review of the denial of asylum was denied because an alien's failure to address or adequately explain his inconsistent testimony concerning the period of time during which he allegedly went into hiding supported an adverse credibility determination since it involved the heart of the asylum claim and was not a minor disparity.
|
|||||
| Shi Guang Dong v. Gonzales, No. 04-2035-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Review of the dismissal of an alien's appeal from the denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal was denied because the record supported the IJ's adverse credibility finding; there were material discrepancies in the alien's testimony and submissions and neither the IJ nor BIA were compelled to accept the alien's explanations.
|
|||||
| Tandia v. Gonzales, Docket No. 03-4942,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An immigrant's application for asylum was improperly denied based on a determination that he found a safe-haven in France because the decision was made after 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(d) was repealed; moreover, an adverse credibility determination was not supported by substantial evidence based on statements in an unrecorded interview.
|
|||||
| United States v. Adeyi, No. 05-1722-cr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for importation and possession of heroin with intent to distribute was upheld. Permitting a government handwriting expert to opine as to the authorship of certain paper found in defendant's luggage and permitting a customs inspector to testify as to his education and training did not constitute plain error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b).
|
|||||
| Zhou Zong Deng v. Gonzales, No. 04-0715-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An alien was granted a remand after the denial of his motion to reconsider a final order of removal because the BIA abused its discretion in affirming, without clarification, the IJ's finding that the alien did not suffer persecution and had no claim to refugee status when the child he fathered with his girlfriend was forcibly aborted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
