 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Xiu Zhen Li v. Bd. of Immigration Appeals, No. 04-5659-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: IJ's adverse credibility determination and denial of asylum were not supported by substantial evidence because the alien's testimony about her forced abortion and attempt to evade authorities did not conflict with country condition reports or her relatives' letters and the IJ did not specify the documents she believed were not authentic.
|
|||||
| Xue Ying Chen v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Servs., No. 04-6038-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review of decision denying his application for asylum was denied where the alien's lack of credibility was supported by substantial evidence, under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B), because the circumstances that IJ relied on in determining that the alien lacked credibility bore a legitimate nexus to the alien's claim of persecution.
|
|||||
| Zhong Qiao Zheng v. Gonzales, No. 04-3845-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review of decision denying asylum and withholding of removal was denied where IJ's findings that alien's testimony was incredible and unreliable were supported by substantial evidence in the record, under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and alien waived his challenge to IJ's corroboration finding by not addressing it in his brief.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
