 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Wang v. United States DOJ & Ag Gonzales, No. 02-4993-ag NAC,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review of the denial of her asylum application was denied because the IJ properly found the alien's testimony incredible based on the inconsistent and implausible nature of important aspects of that testimony; the alien's testimony regarding the jobs she held while in hiding from family planning officials was inconsistent.
|
|||||
| Adkins v. GMC, No. 05-2059-cv/05-2308-cv,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Corporation should have prevailed on motion for judgment as a matter of law as to shareholder's breach of fiduciary duty claim where there was no cognizable theory underlying claim because, inter alia, shareholder lacked standing to bring a derivative claim because he did not maintain equity interest in dealership throughout pendency of litigation.
|
|||||
| Babi Int'l v. Snapple Bev. Corp., No. 05-3939,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Brown v. Smith, No. 04-2467-pr,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly denied § 2254 petition. Where state trial court excused four venire members who had spoken with victim's mother and then excused two others who responded to court's inquiry to group about whether they had heard any remarks about case outside the courtroom, state appellate court reasonably concluded that jury was impartial.
|
|||||
| Butler v. N.Y. State Teamsters Conf. Pension & Ret. Fund, No. 05-1432-cv,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Chen v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Servs., No. 04-1545,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review of the denial of his CAT claim was denied because without any link between the alien and Falun Gong (the alien had acknowledged that he was not a Falun Gong practitioner, and his testimony that he was perceived as one was incredible), it was irrelevant how Falun Gong practitioners were treated in China.
|
|||||
| Chung Sai Zheng v. Gonzales, Docket No. 02-8425-ag,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The petition for review was granted. Because the IJ failed to justify the alien's credibility finding on the basis of record evidence--but because the court could not say that a reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude that the alien was credible--the court vacated the decision below and remanded the case.
|
|||||
| Cohn v. New Paltz Cent. Sch. Dist., No. 05-2022,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court lacked jurisdiction, under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1291, over superintendent's interlocutory appeal from the denial of his motion for qualified immunity where the availability of qualified immunity could not have been determined as a matter of law because complaint's allegations were sufficient to state "class of one" Equal Protection claim.
|
|||||
| Coudert v. Janney Montgomery Scott, LLC, No. 05-4200,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary dismissal of plaintiff's Title VII and ADEA claims was affirmed because a supervisor's comment that plaintiff was "the worst victim type in the office" did not directly refer to either her age or sex, and plaintiff's attempt to link the earlier conduct at one office to the later conduct at another office was not supported by the evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
