LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals - November 8, 2007

  
Ai Jiang v. Gonzales, 06-3264-ag, NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252 (b)(4)(B), substantial evidence did not support an IJ's and the BIA's denial of asylum to a Chinese applicant where the BIA took administrative notice of a State Department report of the Chinese government's recent regulation of religion, but the BIA failed to undertake an assessment of the most relevant background evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Alliance for Open Soc'y Int'l, Inc. v. United States Agency for Int'l Dev., No. 06-4035-cv, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where federal agencies implemented new guidelines regarding Leadership Act's policy requirement while preliminary injunction enjoining agencies from applying their interpretation of Leadership Act was in effect, a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the case to district court to determine if new guidelines warranted continuance of injunction.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cine SK8, Inc. v. Town of Henrietta, Docket No. 06-1718-cv, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Summary judgment on substantive due process claim was vacated. Plaintiffs raised genuine issues of material fact as to whether they had property interest in special use permit and whether defendants infringed on that property right in arbitrary manner by acting on basis of racial animus or through process tainted with procedural irregularities.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jalloh v. Keisler, 06-5825-ag, NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of the alien's application for withholding of removal was properly supported. Substantial evidence supported BIA's determination that country conditions in Sierra Leone fundamentally changed such that the alien could not establish that he would more likely than not be persecuted if returned.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Accolla, No. 05-1872-cr, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant's record on appeal was insufficient to determine whether trial counsel's decisions were reasonable and whether prejudice resulted so as to constitute ineffective assistance of counsel, the appeal was dismissed so that defendant could bring his claims in a 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 petition so that district court could fully develop record.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Maldonado, No. 06-3352-cr, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where record indicated that on remand a sentencing judge considered all relevant factors before determining that she would have imposed substantially the same sentence that was originally imposed, court could not say that decision of judge on remand not to resentence defendant was procedurally unreasonable; thus, defendant's sentence was affirmed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Sanchez, No. 05-2143-cr, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Shellef, Docket Nos. 06-1495-cr (L), 06-1710-cr (CON), UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Judgments of conviction against two defendants were vacated. Because commission of the alleged wire fraud and conspiracy neither depended upon nor necessarily led to the commission of the alleged 1996 tax misconduct and proof of the one act neither constituted nor depended upon proof of the other, joinder was improper under Fed. R. Crim. P. 8.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Spellicy, No. 06-0308-cr, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction was affirmed. Town justice had substantial basis for probable cause finding. Defendant's neighbor told police he saw defendant moving rifles from his truck into his garage. Police investigator met with neighbor, had him sign sworn affidavit, and corroborated defendant's address and claim that defendant was convicted felon.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.