LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals - March 22, 2006

  
Anderson v. County of Nassau, No. 05-1957-pr, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dicko v. Gonzales, No. 04-0803-ag, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A petition for review was dismissed as to the asylum claim because the court lacked jurisdiction to review the determination that it was untimely. The petition was granted with regards to the withholding of removal and CAT claims because the IJ overlooked evidence that provided in specific terms the corroboration the IJ said was missing.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Donhauser v. Goord, 04-2222pr (LEAD); 04-2490pr (CON), UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Vacatur of a preliminary injunction was ordered in a sex offender's § 1983 action because the district court's Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a) findings were unclear with respect to whether prisoners were denied good time credit as an automatic and direct result of refusal to provide a full sexual history required to participate in a rehabilitation program.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Fang Ren He v. Bd. of Immigration Appeals, No. 04-5683-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An alien's petition for review was denied because an inconsistency in the details of the alien's alleged arrest for publicly practicing Falun Gong involved the heart of the asylum claim and was not a minor and isolated disparity. Substantial evidence supported the IJ's adverse credibility finding.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Francis v. Elmsford Sch. Dist., Docket No. 05-0865-cv, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) determination that was sent to an employee did not constitute an EEOC notice that triggered the 90-day period referred to in 29 U.S.C.S. § 626(e) where, inter alia, the determination was issued by SDHR, not by EEOC, and the determination indicated that EEOC had yet to consider the employee's complaint.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Garcia v. Teitler, Docket No. 04-4886-cv, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: District court properly exercised jurisdiction over parties' attorney fees dispute since 28 U.S.C.S. § 1367 did not limit court's power to exercise ancillary jurisdiction over matters related to ongoing criminal cases. Resolution of fee dispute fell within district court's ancillary powers, as it related to court's ability to function successfully.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jian Lin Yang v. Gonzales, No. 04-4906-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where an alien's motion to reopen his removal proceedings was untimely under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and the alien failed to establish changed country conditions excusing the untimeliness of the motion, the BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying the alien's motion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Johnson v. Gonzales, No. 05-3231-ag, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: There was no record evidence that the immigrant's purportedly diminished mental capacity affected his ability to appreciate what was happening during his hearing. It also did not appear that his condition rose to the level of mental incompetence as contemplated by the asylum regulations.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kong Xian Guo v. Gonzales, No. 04-3593-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Alien failed to establish eligibility for asylum, as IJ's adverse credibility finding was supported by substantial evidence; there was significant inconsistency between asylum application, which had claimed his wife was forcibly sterilized, and statement attached to application and his wife's letter, which asserted she was not sterilized.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Li Chen v. Gonzales, No. 04-5039-ag NAC, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence supported denial of an alien's application for asylum and withholding of removal based on adverse credibility finding because alien provided conflicting testimony regarding a document he submitted to prove he had been detained in China. Also, it was unlikely he had been issued passport for second attempt to enter United States.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.