LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals - January 4, 2006

  
Banda v. N.J. Dep't of Mental Health Servs., NO. 05-4142, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Plaintiff's appeal from dismissal of his § 1983 action under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) was dismissed as frivolous pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B) because action challenged his involuntarily commitment under New Jersey Sexually Violent Predator Act, so his claim for immediate release had to be sought through petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re D'Amario, NO. 05-5224, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Inmate's petition for writ of mandamus to compel district court to release and to recuse district judge from further participating in his § 2255 motion was denied because petition directly challenged his conviction and sentence and, thus, should be brought under § 2255, and request to recuse was moot as judge had ruled on motion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Wallace, NO. 05-4934, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Marin v. Gonzales, No. 04-2727, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Alien was properly denied asylum because even if three threatening phone calls that he received over course of four years while he was in Columbia were the true reason that he left, they were not based on any of five grounds for asylum enumerated in the INA, 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(42)(A).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ruggiero v. United States, NO. 05-1315, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Action brought by parents of service member who died when he fell out his dormitory window was properly dismissed because it was barred by Feres doctrine; member's military service was the but-for cause of his presence in dorm on night of his death, so his death was incident to his service.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Singh v. AG of the United States, NO. 05-1886, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Alien's motion to reopen, which was based on change of country conditions and alleged that police had raided his home, asking for him, was properly denied because affidavits of two relatives provided by alien did not state how they knew about raid and did not give details about raid, such as whether police stated why they were looking for alien.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.