 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ahmed v. AG of the United States, No. 06-1917,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien was removable under INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) for having been convicted of aggravated felony pursuant to INA § 101(a)(43)(G) because his term of probation, which was imposed following his state grand larceny conviction, was revoked and he was sentenced to one year imprisonment, which was treated as punishment for original theft offense.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Sload, No. 06-1638,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Some of public employee's claims were time-barred, unexhausted, or barred on immunity grounds; of his claims that survived public employers' motion to dismiss, none was supported by evidence sufficient to survive summary judgment. District court's dismissal of employee's 42 U.S.C.S. §§ 2000e, 1981, 1983, 1985, 1986, claims was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Ibrahim v. AG of the United States, No. 05-2622,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B), aliens' petition for review of the denial of their request for asylum and other relief was denied because consideration of the aliens' testimonial inconsistencies coupled with the documentary evidence presented revealed substantial evidence to support the Immigration Judge's adverse credibility determination.
|
|||||
| McKeithan v. Jones, NO. 05-2238,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prison officials were properly granted summary judgment in inmate's § 1983 action alleging that cell search was in retaliation for prior grievance in violation of First Amendment and misconduct hearing violated due process because six-month disciplinary confinement imposed on inmate did not violate protected interest as defined by Sandin v. Conner.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. Lockheed Martin Corp., NO. 06-1704,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly entered for former employer because terminated employee failed to establish prima facie case of discrimination under ADA. Employee's evidence did not raise disputed issues of material fact as to whether, for purposes of ADA, his seizure disorder rendered him disabled or whether employer perceived him as being disabled.
|
|||||
| Shahinlli v. AG of the United States, No. 05-1129,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b), the court did not have jurisdiction to review the denial of aliens' claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and other relief where the denial occurred almost two years prior. Further, their brief did not raise arguments with regard to the denial of their motion to reopen and motion to reconsider.
|
|||||
| Telegrafi v. AG of the United States, Nos. 06-1770 and 06-2334,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Zmijewski, No. 06-2893,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
