 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Thompson v. Eva's Vill. & Sheltering Program, NO. 05-4618,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a reasonable person would not have questioned the impartiality of the judges in a meeting attendee's district court case, recusal was not warranted. Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the recusal motions. The rest of the attendee's appeal was dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| United States v. Jacobs, NO. 05-2711,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 18 U.S.C.S. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence was properly denied because Amendment 599 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines did not apply to the facts of the case because defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(1), not 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(c).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
