LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals - January 10, 2007

  
Bradley v. O'Donoghue, No: 05-4246, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where guardian claimed, inter alia, that the location of restaurant and the location of its driveway were dangerous conditions that led pedestrians into an intersection, but minor was merely passing through restaurant driveway, restaurant did not have a duty to minor; district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of restaurant was affirmed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Chao Jiang v. AG of the United States, No. 06-4682, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Alien's second motion to reopen was properly denied because alien's allegations did not show that alien exercised due diligence in pursuing his claim as alien did not request copy of record under FOIA upon which second motion was based until years after his first motion to reopen was denied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ibarra-Villalva v. USP-Allenwood, No. 06-2723, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Inmate's appeal of the dismissal of his civil rights claims was dismissed under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(e)(2)(B), as his action was frivolous and failed to state a claim. The inmate's admissions contradicted claims that he had been deprived of food and bed linens, and a denial of requested medication did not amount to a constitutional violation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Obi, No. 06-4906, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Alien's petition for writ of mandamus directing district court to dismiss criminal indictment charging him with violating 8 U.S.C.S. § 1253(a)(1)(B) on ground it was unlawful because of pending petition for review of removal order was denied as nothing prohibited issuance of indictment during judicial review of administrative proceedings.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jakubowski v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 06-1377, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: ALJ cited to specific medical evidence in his decision to support his finding that applicant's impairments were not severe, which established that ALJ's opinion on the severity of those impairments was supported by substantial evidence. Denial of applicant's DIB under Title II of the Social Security Act was affirmed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Marks v. Marina Dist. Dev. Co., LLC, No. 05-3619, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: There were no evidentiary errors that warranted reversal of a judgment in favor of a casino on casino patrons' tort claims arising from a detention by security personnel; an expert could not be questioned on redirect examination about a matter not raised on direct or cross-examination, and the patrons were not prejudiced by an unanswered question.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Mauro v. Beil, No. 06-2065, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Plumbay v. AG of the United States, No. 05-4936, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Petition for review was denied. Substantial evidence supported IJ's adverse credibility finding. Although alien sought asylum and other relief based on political persecution, during post-detention interview she denied that she was threatened or mistreated in Albania. Alien gave significantly inconsistent statements about alleged abduction attempt.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sepulveda v. Smith, No. 06-3147, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Inmate's § 2241 petition was properly denied as his claims that he could not make fair cross-selection challenge to jury because census statistics were not available and that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request fees for expert investigation work and census statistics fell under § 2255 as they challenged validity of his conviction.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Smith v. Johnson, NO. 06-1674, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because plaintiff's actions in filing a statement itemizing the relief she sought constituted a good faith attempt to comply with the district court's order directing her to submit a more specific statement of the relief requested, and given plaintiff's pro se status, it was improper for the district court to dismiss her complaint.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.