 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Cramer, No. 06-1004,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: All three clauses in 18 U.S.C.S. § 2251(b) were applied to the words or phrases immediately preceding them in the opening clause of 18 U.S.C.S. § 2251(b), and qualified the independent conditions, for which the violation of any one would result in punishment; thus the government did not misinterpret the statute.
|
|||||
| Virgin Islands v. Hodge, NO. 06-1036,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction under 21 U.S.C.S. § 844(a) for possession of controlled substance, cocaine base, was affirmed; evidence supported finding that defendant knowingly exercised dominion and control over narcotics found in his vehicle, which he was operating at time, as they were in pocket of driver's door in plain view of driver.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
