 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adebiyi v. Gonzales, No. 05-1614,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A change in U.S. law and the personal decision to start and raise a family in the U.S. long after the date for an alien's voluntary departure from the U.S. did not provide a basis for considering an alien's motion to reopen deportation proceedings seven years after the alien's appeal from the denial of his asylum application was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Beaton v. AG of the United States, NO: 05-3517, NO: 05-3988,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) , January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court declined to reach merits of an alien's challenge to a removal order. Record was insufficient to allow court to determine whether removal order was rendered invalid by vacation of prior drug-related conviction, which had resulted in original deportation. The alien had to exhaust his administrative remedies by filing motion to reopen with BIA.
|
|||||
| Sassone v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 05-2089,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's determination that the claimant was capable of performing a significant number of light and sedentary jobs in the national economy, and that he thus was not disabled as defined by the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.S. § 401 et seq.
|
|||||
| United States v. Veras de los Santos, No: 05-1168,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's aiding and abetting wire fraud conviction was affirmed. Evidence supported the conviction and warranted the giving of a "deliberate indifference" jury instruction. District court properly denied Fed. R. Crim. P. 29 new trial motion that asserted evidentiary insufficiency claim. Defendant was not prejudiced by use of redacted statement.
|
|||||
| Will v. Northwestern Univ. (In re Nutraquest, Inc.), No. 04-4387, Adversary Proceeding No. 04-cv-01275,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion when it upheld bankruptcy court's decision approving settlement agreement between bankruptcy debtor, other ephedra product makers, and dead football player's estate. Court properly applied Martin analysis; it did not err in finding "good faith" as required under Illinois Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
