 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bass v. Butler, NO. 06-1037,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claimant's challenges to § 415 of Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act were rendered moot by final adjudication of her workers' compensation case in state courts, which occurred prior to district court's entry of summary judgment against her; thus, district court lacked U.S. Const. art. III jurisdiction over case at time it entered judgment.
|
|||||
| In re Carroway, No. 06-5129,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied petitioner's second petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C.S. § 1651(a) from district court that would intervene in his state criminal proceedings because petitioner failed to make any of prerequisite showings required to confer writ of mandamus, and relief sought by petitioner was outside scope of writ.
|
|||||
| Regan v. Lackawanna County Hous. Auth., No. 04-2355,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's dismissal of employee's claims against employer and individuals was affirmed because employee's take on relevant events was contrary to preclusive factual findings of Pennsylvania Civil Service Commission and was otherwise wholly unsubstantiated by record, and district court gave ample attention to all of employee's legal claims.
|
|||||
| Ridley v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 05-5134; No. 06-1690,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In this Title VII action, the district court did not err by denying the employer's motion for judgment as a matter of law on the retaliatory constructive discharge claim; the evidence from which a jury could find that the manager knew about the employee's complaint of discrimination was circumstantial, but sufficient to support the jury's finding.
|
|||||
| United States v. Brown, Case No.: 06-2822,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The judgment revoking appellant's probation and sentencing her to five months imprisonment was affirmed because the district court meaningfully considered the relevant 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors; the district court considered appellant's breach of the court's trust, the nature of her probation violations, and her disrespect for the court.
|
|||||
| United States v. Grier, No. 05-1698,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Neither the Fifth nor the Sixth Amendment required that facts relevant to an enhancement of defendant's sentence be established beyond a reasonable doubt, whether or not those facts involved defendant's commission of a "separate offense." However, the district court failed to adequately explain how it applied the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
