 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ng v. AG of the United States, No. 04-4672,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A deportation order under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) was properly entered where an immigrant was convicted under 18 U.S.C.S. § 1958 because this was an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(43)(F); it was a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C.S. § 16, despite the fact that a putative hitman had no intention of killing.
|
|||||
| Siebert v. Norwest Bank , No. 04-4422,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the individuals' request for attorney's fees and costs under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1447(c) because the district court properly exercised its discretion and found that even if the company should have obtained written consents to removal, the law on that procedural issue was debatable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Lackey, No: 03-1486,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 7, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although it was improper under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) to admit evidence to show intent to distribute in defendant's drug trial about a prior incident when he had shared marijuana with a friend, the defendant waived any objection to the incident's use as impeachment evidence by electing to disclose the incident first during his direct examination.
|
|||||
| Vuong v. J.C. Penney's Co., No: 05-3316,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employers were properly granted summary judgment on employee's discrimination claims brought under Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, Title VII, and ADEA because employee failed to exhaust administrative remedies or establish reasonable inference that employee's explanations for terminating employee were pretextual and unworthy of credence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
