 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gresh v. Godshall, NO. 05-4181,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of former arrestee's § 1983 action against officers was affirmed. Probable cause supported his two arrests, search of his auto was valid under automobile exception to warrant requirement, he failed to provide support for his due process, conspiracy, and punitive police conduct claims, and dismissal of pendent state claim was proper.
|
|||||
| Jin Li Feng v. AG of the United States, No. 04-3943,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review, under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B), of a U.S. Department of Justice Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision was granted as the BIA based its adverse credibility determinations on impermissible speculation and on differences that were collateral to the question of whether the sterilization of the alien was voluntary.
|
|||||
| Jordan v. Horn, No. 03-3541,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's § 1983 destruction of property without due process claim was properly dismissed because record showed that DOC conducted independent investigation of inmate's grievance and responded to him, and absence of final response to inmate's appeal of denial of his grievance did not render inadequate otherwise adequate post-deprivation remedy.
|
|||||
| Koger v. Kaplan, Inc., NO. 05-3702,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted on a student's 42 U.S.C.S. § 1981 claim because the district court committed no error in considering evidence outside of the pleadings as it did so only in the context of consideration of a motion for summary judgment and only after the parties had been notified of the conversion.
|
|||||
| Mash Enters. v. Prolease Atl. Corp., Nos: 04-1821/3422,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mogot v. AG, NOS. 04-4461; 05-1278,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Asylum petition failed because there was no evidence that supported a finding that anyone associated with the Indonesian government knew anything about the abuse that a foreign citizen suffered in a sanitarium, allegedly because of a religious conversion to Christianity, much less that the government was unwilling or somehow unable to protect him.
|
|||||
| Shonali Tahiliani v. Bayer MaterialScience L.L.C., NO. 05-1738,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Siemens Fin. Servs., Inc., v. Robert J. Combs Ins. Agency, Inc., No. 02-4141,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly granted summary judgment to a financial services company and its communications company subsidiary on various contract related claims because an insurance agent failed to show that the various conversations between the parties constituted an oral agreement between the companies and a corporation that the agent owned.
|
|||||
| Tahiliani v. Bayer Corp., NO. 04-2499,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e et seq. failed because the court would not believe that the employer--having refrained from retaliating after each of the employee's previous EEOC filings--would nevertheless begin retaliating after receiving a petition to reopen an EEOC complaint which had terminated in its favor.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
