Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	Federal Courts - 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals - February 9, 2006
	United States v. Banks, NO. 05-4437, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Defendant's petition for writ of error coram nobis was properly denied where he had not shown that his conviction carried continuing consequences, or that sound reasons existed for his failure to seek relief earlier, and, while he argued that U.S. omitted element of materiality from information, materiality of misrepresentations was not a question. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Coles, No. 04-2134, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Defendant's drug and firearm convictions were vacated because a warrantless search of defendant's hotel room violated the Fourth Amendment. The search was not justified by exigent circumstances; officers had created the exigency because it was not reasonable for them to have knocked on the hotel room door without first obtaining a warrant. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Seal, NO: 04-1101, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: District court did not err in dismissing a juror for cause pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 23(b) and proceeding with 11 jurors because the juror consulted an extraneous source for the definition of entrapment, an issue that was not part of the case, concealed a printout of the definition, and then read the definition to the other jurors. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.