 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sieprawski v. AG of the United States, No. 05-4227,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the BIA introduced no direct evidence of mailing, but did produce a correctly addressed cover letter, the court held that this was substantial evidence to support the BIA's finding of service and denial of a motion to reissue. Thus, citizen's claim that his motion for reopening was not untimely under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(1), failed.
|
|||||
| Hall v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., Case No: 06-2128,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The order denying an application for social security disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act was reversed and remanded; because the ALJ recognized in her decision several nonexertional limitations arising from the claimant's impairments, the ALJ's reliance on the medical-vocational guidelines constituted reversible error.
|
|||||
| Montanye v. Wissahickon Sch. Dist., No. 05-5286,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Teacher's conduct in accompanying a student to therapy sessions was not protected by the First Amendment against infringement by school officials because there was no intent to convey a message, nor did the teacher's actions constitute protected activity for purposes of a retaliation claim under 29 U.S.C.S. § 794 of the Rehabilitation Act.
|
|||||
| Plaza v. Barnhart, NO. 06-3555,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the Commissioner of Social Security regarding a claimant's application for benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act was affirmed; it was entirely proper for the ALJ to consider whether the claimant was able to engage in any other substantial gainful work that existed in the national economy.
|
|||||
| Stackhouse v. Pa. State Police, No. 05-4784; No. 05-4785; No. 06-2185 (Consolidated),
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly gave a clarifying jury instruction regarding a state police officer's failure-to-promote disparate treatment claim under 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e-2(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the court properly removed language that was applicable to a mixed motive case, as the case had been tried as a pretext case.
|
|||||
| United States v. Anderson, No. 05-2346,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was charged with and convicted of 18 U.S.C.S. § 134 mail fraud and 26 U.S.C.S. § 7201 tax evasion; the jury instruction charges simply stated the correct legal standard for finding an individual liable under 18 U.S.C.S. § 1341, and therefore were legally correct and in no way amended or varied from the charges against defendant.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
