 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Am. Soc'y for Testing & Materials v. Corrpro Cos., No. 05-4164,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In this indemnification action, the judgment was affirmed with respect to settlement costs and attorney's fees in the antitrust litigation; the instant court declined to apply the business judgment rule so as to reverse the district court's indemnification order challenged on this appeal because plaintiff failed to act in good faith.
|
|||||
| Discenza v. Hill, NO. 06-4109,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly dismissed former Department of Navy employee's claims against government workers because individual employees could not be held liable under Title VII, and employee's Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act claims failed because the government had not waived sovereign immunity.
|
|||||
| Escobar v. AG of the United States, No. 05-5175,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the appellate court disagreed with the BIA's finding that the alien was convicted under subsection (1) of N.Y. Penal Law § 220.16, it did not agree that the alien's conviction was an aggravated felony; thus, the alien was eligible to be considered for cancellation of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229b(a).
|
|||||
| Eti v. AG of the United States, No. 05-4545,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An IJ's determination that a Chinese Christian citizen of Indonesia had not established a well-founded fear of persecution for purposes of asylum under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158 was supported by substantial evidence because the evidence did not compel a finding that there was a pattern and practice of persecution of Chinese Christians in Indonesia.
|
|||||
| In re Orlando, No. 07-1152,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Krebs v. Meyers, NO. 06-4873,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tenant could not remove a landlord's complaint under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1443 because the tenant was not denied a right under any law providing for equal civil rights based upon the state court's decision that a non-attorney could not represent her, and the tenant did not contend that the state court applied that requirement in a discriminatory manner.
|
|||||
| Livingston v. Borough of McKees Rocks, No. 05-4287,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly entered against appellants in their § 1983 suit. Their U.S. Const. amend. I retaliation claims were either time-barred or were legally insufficient. Appellants' Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law claims were time-barred under 43 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1424(a) or no evidence was presented to rebut appellees' § 1424(c) defense.
|
|||||
| Tjandra v. AG of the United States, No. 05-5347,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported IJ's finding that alien did not qualify for withholding of removal under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1231(b)(3)(A) because isolated incidents that did not result in serious injury did not rise to level of past persecution, and there was no evidence that alien would face individualized risk of persecution upon return to Indonesia.
|
|||||
| United States v. Kukafka, No. 05-1955,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a district court erred when sentencing defendant on 18 U.S.C.S. § 228(a)(1) offense, it properly convicted him under § 228(a)(1), (3), for willfully failing to pay child support to his out-of-state children. Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act of 1998 was proper exercise of Commerce Clause power. Jury was properly instructed on "willfulness."
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
