 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barzeski v. Comm'r, NO. 05-4012,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Taxpayer's petition of a notice of deficiency that was issued after he failed to file income tax returns for three years was properly dismissed by the U.S. Tax Court because the taxpayer failed to advance any legitimate claims to undermine the deficiency notice. Instead, he merely stated frivolous arguments protesting the imposition of income tax.
|
|||||
| Barzeski v. Comm'r, NO. 05-4013,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The United States Tax Court properly dismissed a taxpayer's petition challenging a deficiency notice that assessed the taxpayer for failing to file income tax returns for three years because the taxpayer's arguments were simply frivolous and groundless protests against the imposition of income tax on the whole.
|
|||||
| Farag v. AG of the United States, No. 05-1914,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported the BIA's denial of an alien's application for deferral of removal to Egypt because the alien did not show that it was more likely than not that he would be tortured by authorities if he returned to Egypt. Moreover, evidence showed that criminal deportees were not subject to detention upon their removal to Egypt.
|
|||||
| Prawira v. AG of the United States, No. 05-2559,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where some of the incidents of which an alien complained had occurred when he was a child, over 50 years ago, and the more recent incidents he described were isolated and were not severe enough to constitute persecution, his petition for review was denied, and the BIA's decision was affirmed under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B).
|
|||||
| United States v. Tupone, Case No: 04-2832,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in its guidelines application by assuming the loss in a case where defendant falsely obtained benefits in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 1920 was the entire amount of benefits, when it should have been the difference between the amount actually obtained and the amount that would have been received but for the falsity.
|
|||||
| Woodlen v. Jimenez, NO: 05-3143,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even assuming appellant's conduct of yelling at officers was not sufficient to justify the use of handcuffs and confinement during an investigatory stop, the appellate court could not conclude that the right to be free from physical restraint under these circumstances was clearly established; officers were properly granted qualified immunity.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
