Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	Federal Courts - 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals - April 19, 2007
	United States v. Robinson, No. 06-1699, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, April 19, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: District court properly applied career offender enhancement under USSG § 4B1.1(a)(3) to sentence imposed following defendant's guilty plea to violating 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1) because his state convictions for simple assault and terroristic threats constituted prior felony convictions as they had maximum sentences of five and two years. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Snow, No. 05-4440, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, April 19, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: District court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress without holding Franks hearing because counsel's statement after district court denied motion that there was ambiguity as to timing as to when some issues happened was insufficient to make preliminary showing under Franks that affiant included false statement in warrant affidavit. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co. v. Harmonay, Nos. 06-5028, 07-1566, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, April 19, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Firms urged that former employees should essentially be prevented from using anything they learned while at the firms; district court was affirmed because it ordered the return of all data that was taken, and the record before the appellate court reflected no other specific confidential information that the employees had taken or were using. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.