Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	Federal Courts - 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals - April 24, 2006
	Karkkainen v. Kovalchuk, Nos. 05-1581 and 05-2202, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, April 24, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Denial of a mother's petition for return of child under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction was affirmed; the child's conduct, including her preparatory academic work and enrollment in an American school, reflected her acclimatization and a degree of settled purpose to remain in the United States. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Pennavaria, No. 04-3556, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, April 24, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Government prevailed in its 18 U.S.C.S. § 3742 sentencing appeal. District court committed plain error under Booker when it sentenced defendant pursuant to mandatory federal sentencing guidelines scheme. Third Circuit precedent required that case be remanded back for resentencing. Such a remand did not violate due process ex post facto principles. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Risha, No. 04-4677, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, April 24, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A remand of an order granting a new trial based on a Brady violation was necessary because the district court failed to make the necessary factual findings for its conclusion that the government had possession of impeachment information. More facts were needed to determine if there was constructive knowledge of the impeachment information. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.