LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals - April 30, 2007

  
United States v. Neidig, No. 06-1588, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, April 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's 151-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to deliver cocaine was affirmed because district court properly calculated defendant's base offense level, designating him as career offender under USSG § 4B1.1, and properly considered nature and circumstances of defendant's escape conviction and criminal history.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Santiago, No. 06-4728, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, April 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ye v. United States, Case No: 06-1034, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, April 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: When public health center physician assured patient that he would be fine and patient later suffered a heart attack, physician was entitled to summary judgment in a state-created danger action filed by patient's son under § 1983. Assurance was not affirmative act that restrained patient's personal liberty or violated substantive Due Process Clause.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.