 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Santiago, No. 05-1515,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, May 10, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because, inter alia, defendant was questioned before his formal arrest for an armed robbery and well before his indictment, the right to counsel did not attach until the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings and his confession was not wrongfully admitted in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights.
|
|||||
| United States v. Santiago, No. 05-1649,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, May 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for interference with commerce by robbery under Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C.S. § 1951, was affirmed because his prosecution did not violate Commerce Clause as Hobbs Act could be applied to robberies involving minimal impact on interstate commerce, and government satisfied its burden of showing impact on interstate commerce.
|
|||||
| United States v. Savage, No. 05-3074,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, May 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's chosen sentence, 120 months imprisonment, fell within both the 26 and 24 offense level ranges. Thus, even if defendant was correct that his total offense level should have been 24, the appellate court saw no reason to vacate his sentence, as it fell within the guideline range corresponding to offense level 24.
|
|||||
| United States v. Tykarsky, No. 04-4092,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, May 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When a jury failed to make a special finding that defendant's use of the Internet to engage in illicit sex with a minor occurred after the effective date of Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to End the Exploitation of Children Today Act, Pub. L. No. 108-21, 117 Stat. 650 (2003), defendant's sentence under 18 U.S.C.S. § 2422(b) was vacated.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
