 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Mattison, No. 04-4139,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While district court's application of Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory determinant in sentencing was error, district court announced that it would impose higher sentence if Guidelines did not apply. Given increased alternative discretionary sentence, error did not affect defendant's substantial rights under Sixth Amendment and was thus harmless.
|
|||||
| United States v. Morton, No. 06-7036, 05-7887,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Paschal, No. 06-4376,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence imposed on defendant, who pleaded guilty to obstructing the administration of the internal revenue laws, was upheld because it was presumptively reasonable since it was within the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range, the district court set forth its reasoning, and defendant did not show that it was procedurally or substantively unreasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Short, No. 04-5110,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's order revoking defendant's supervised release was affirmed as preponderance of the evidence standard was correctly applied to determine whether a violation of supervised release occurred and supervised release violation hearing was completely separate and distinct from any state proceedings, under 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 3583(e)(3), 3606.
|
|||||
| United States v. Smith, No. 06-7046,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Stotts, No. 06-7216,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. White, No. 06-7294,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Williams v. Bassett, No. 06-6938,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
