 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Perez-Mendez, No. 04-4151,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court committed plain Booker error in enhancing defendant's sentence under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 based on its findings that he obstructed justice, because this resulted in a longer term of imprisonment than the court could have imposed based solely on the facts admitted by defendant.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rodriguez, No. 04-4609,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's sentence was vacated where he properly preserved his claim of statutory Booker error by raising a timely Blakely objection at sentencing and the district court erred in treating the sentencing guidelines as mandatory, which prejudiced appellant because he may have been sentenced differently under an advisory guidelines regime.
|
|||||
| United States v. Savage, No. 04-5127,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition convictions under 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(1) (2000) were affirmed because his motion to suppress evidence was properly denied. Further, the court properly determined defendant was convicted of the predicate offenses required by the Armed Career Criminal Act in enhancing defendant's sentence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Williams, No. 05-7299,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Weeks v. Powell, No. 05-7320,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Williams v. Harkleroad, No. 05-7263,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Williams v. Walker, No. 05-7252,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
