 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Hackley, No. 04-6025,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of § 2255 relief was affirmed. Inmates' belated statements that suggested defendant was not involved in murder could not satisfy defendant's burden of proving there was a reasonable probability that the jury verdict would have been different if statements were considered. Defendant thus failed to prove materiality to support Brady claim.
|
|||||
| United States v. Haines, No. 04-4261,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's sentence was not enhanced based on any controverted fact, there was no Sixth Amendment violation under Booker.
|
|||||
| United States v. Lamkin, No. 04-4249,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction and sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(e), was affirmed because there was no Sixth Amendment violation as the district court could consider defendant's prior convictions without a jury finding and the district court did not err in its application of the Act to defendant's predicate offenses.
|
|||||
| United States v. Shifflett, No. 04-6930,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate who was denied habeas relief failed to meet the requisite showing to obtain a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c)(1); because his conviction became final before Booker was decided, he could not raise Blakely and Booker issues on collateral review.
|
|||||
| United States v. Singletary, No. 03-7803,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
