 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Abdel-Aziz, No. 06-7502,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Daniels, No. 06-4773,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While defense counsel alleged district court erred when it did not advise defendant of his right to persist in his initial plea of not guilty or expressly discuss a waiver of appellate rights, there was no plain error because any alleged error by district court in conducting Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing did not affect defendant's substantial rights.
|
|||||
| United States v. Gibson, No. 06-7406; No. 06-7407,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Johnson, No. 06-4791,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's 151-month sentence for the offense of distributing cocaine base was vacated so that the district court could resentence defendant under an advisory guideline scheme, the 151-month sentence imposed on remand was reasonable because it was within the guideline range and defendant did not rebut the presumption of reasonableness.
|
|||||
| United States v. McDonald, No. 06-4058,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a police officer, shortly after responding to a report of an armed robbery, saw defendant get into a vehicle that matched a description given by the robbery victim, an investigatory stop did not violate the Fourth Amendment because the stop was justified by a reasonable suspicion that the vehicle was connected with the recent robbery.
|
|||||
| United States v. Montoya-Carmona, No. 05-4706,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 enhancement that was applied to sentence of defendant convicted of various drug crimes was proper based on defendant's perjured testimony at trial. Enhancement did not apply simply because defendant was convicted; instead, district court was convinced that defendant perjured himself, independent of jury.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rumph, No. 06-7336,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Tomlin, No. 06-7337,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Webb v. Anderson, No. 06-7340,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
