 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Paul, No. 06-7687,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Certificate of appealability was denied, under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c)(1), and defendant's appeal from dismissal of his motion as successive 8 U.S.C.S. § 2255 motion was dismissed as he did not show that any assessment of constitutional claims by district court was debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling was likewise debatable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Pope, No. 06-4420,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, defendant's motion to suppress evidence of his encounter with a deputy was properly denied because there was no seizure of defendant since he voluntarily spoke with a deputy and there was no coercion, and Miranda did not apply to this encounter until defendant was placed in custody.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rosemond, No. 06-7752,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Certificate of appealability was denied, under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c)(1), and defendant's appeal from dismissal of his motion as successive 8 U.S.C.S. § 2255 motion was dismissed as he did not show that any assessment of constitutional claims by district court was debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling was likewise debatable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Sheppard, No. 06-7661,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Watson, No. 06-7627,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Certificate of appealability was denied, under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c)(1), and defendant's appeal from dismissal of 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 motion was dismissed as he did not show that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether (1) petition stated valid claim of denial of constitutional right and (2) district court was correct in procedural ruling.
|
|||||
| Vester v. Johnson, No. 06-7669,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Williams v. United States, No. 06-7623,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
