 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Miller v. Jackson, No. 05-7323,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Patel v. Gonzales, No. 05-1326,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Baldovinos, No. 05-4252,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment of the district court was affirmed. In resolving defendant's involuntary medication claim, appellate court concluded that its analysis was governed by the principles of Sell, the appellate court accepted the prosecution's concession of plain error, and in the exercise of the appellate court's discretion it declined to correct the error.
|
|||||
| United States v. King, No. 03-4930,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Admission of business records against defendant was not plain error under the Sixth Amendment, because business records were not testimonial, and therefore his convictions were affirmed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Kyle, No. 04-4129,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's Booker challenge to his sentence was rejected under the Sixth Amendment where he admitted the facts underlying his sentence.
|
|||||
| United States v. McCartney, No. 05-4453,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the Government agreed in a plea agreement to recommend a sentence at the low end of the guidelines range, the Government breached the agreement by not making a recommendation; the district court's action in deeming the recommendation made did not excuse the Government's failure to comply.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rizzi, No. 05-4240,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's order granting defendant's motion to suppress was reversed. Because no party questioned that the warrant in the instant case was issued on probable cause and involved controlled substances, 21 U.S.C.S. § 879 authorized its execution at any time day or night.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
