 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Butts v. Jamaludeen, No. 05-7398,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Cirineo v. Adams, No. 05-7257,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Michau v. Charleston County, No. 04-7726, No. 04-7734,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dismissal of an inmate's civil rights claims was affirmed because, although the Prison Litigation Reform Act was inapplicable since the inmate was detained under the Sexually Violent Predator Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 44-48-70, the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
|
|||||
| Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Wainwright, No. 05-1816,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Aubin, No. 05-6427,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Cohn, No. 04-4283,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court dismissed defendant's appeal of his conviction and first three motions for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 as they were untimely filed under Fed. R. App. 4. The court affirmed defendant's conviction as he failed to show in his fourth motion the existence of new evidence for acquittal or exculpatory evidence that was withheld.
|
|||||
| United States v. Cunningham, No. 05-4650,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Dewalt, No. 05-4661,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Green, No. 05-4137,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plea agreement did not limit the United States or defendant from arguing any sentencing factor other than those to which the parties stipulated, the United States' introduction of evidence in support of a one-level increase for taking of security guard's firearm did not amount to a breach of plea agreement. Defendant's sentence was affirmed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
