 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Tekle v. Gonzales, No. 06-1443,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: IJ did not abuse her discretion when she denied alien's motion to reopen and reconsider because, as to motion for reconsideration, alien failed to show any error of law or fact, and, as to request to reopen, alien failed to show that the evidence was material and could not have been presented at the hearing, under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(2), (3).
|
|||||
| Ubl v. Savin Corp., No. 06-1617,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Abraham, No. 05-4707,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions and sentence were affirmed. Search warrant was supported by indicia of probable cause; information provided to trooper by victims and confidential informant was consistent and sufficient nexus existed between shooting investigation and subjects of the search warrant. Defendant's claim of involuntariness had no support.
|
|||||
| United States v. Bowman, No. 06-7201,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Brown, No. 06-4687,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Cunningham, No. 06-4537,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to suppress was properly denied for defendant, who pleaded guilty to various drug conspiracy charges, because defendant's traffic violations provided Fourth Amendment probable cause to stop his vehicle, and a positive alert from a dog sniff provided Fourth Amendment probable cause to search the vehicle for drugs.
|
|||||
| United States v. Gibson, No. 06-7395,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Jacobs, No. 06-7199,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Long, No. 04-4538,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed as defendant's assertion that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment was without merit because, on appeal, defendant did not challenge any factual findings regarding his prior convictions, and he did not dispute the factual basis for the district court's conclusions that he was an armed career criminal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
