 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. McPhatter, No. 06-4352,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Additional drug amounts were properly considered in determining defendant's guideline range, under USSG § 1B1.3, as, during plea hearing, defendant was fully advised that other drug amounts could be considered at sentencing as relevant conduct and could increase his sentence, and he acknowledged his understanding of relevant conduct provisions.
|
|||||
| United States v. Redd, No. 05-5201,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions were affirmed as his guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered after a thorough hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 because, inter alia, there was an independent factual basis for plea and plea was not coerced or influenced by any promises. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to appeal sentence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Waddell, No. 06-4539,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed as defendant's claim that he was entitled to a downward departure from the advisory USSG range based on mental and emotional conditions was not supported by the record and, even if counsel had sought a departure, district court's statements at sentencing indicated that it would not have entertained such a request.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
