 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rowe v. Collins, No. 06-7576,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Smith v. Bazzle, No. 06-7500,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Benites-Correa, No. 06-7609,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Brandon, No. 04-4831,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A sentence of a term of 260 months, imposed for convictions for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and distributing cocaine base, was remanded because the district court's explanations as to its resentencing decision and the nature of its alternate sentence were unclear, and the uncertainty could only be resolved by a remand for resentencing.
|
|||||
| United States v. Edwards, No. 06-4017,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Grady, No. 06-4200,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction and sentence were affirmed. The record reflected that defendant was less than forthcoming concerning his drug activities. Accordingly, there was no issue with the district court's conclusion that defendant was ineligible for application of the safety valve provisions in 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(f) and USSG § 5C1.2.
|
|||||
| United States v. Jones, No. 06-4571,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was reasonable as district court properly calculated advisory USSG range and adequately considered 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors. The district court considered and rejected defendant's contention that he should be sentenced below the advisory USSG range based on his lack of guidance as a youth and his substance abuse problems.
|
|||||
| United States v. Wall, No. 06-4487,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence on the armed bank robbery count was affirmed. The district court did not clearly err in the application of the two-level U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1(c) (2003) enhancement for defendant's role in the offense.
|
|||||
| United States v. Whitaker, No. 06-4543,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed. Defendant agreed he was accountable for between three and seven firearms. Given this agreement, the source of information supporting the enhancement was irrelevant. Furthermore, his concession rendered his objection to the enhancement on Sixth Amendment grounds and Booker meritless.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
